Cane Creek 110 IS Review

Components Pro Reviews

Impression
When first examining and holding the 110, you notice the quality that went into this product, the smooth bearings, nice anodizing, gorgeous shapes, and precise machining, especially of the Interloc spacers. On close examination, you really notice the precision of all the components, which are all explanatory. It’s one pretty baby!

Once the preload has been set properly, the 110 IS has been smooth as silk, and I have never felt any binding, notching nor looseness from the system. I have plummeted it through ugly rock gardens, slammed it into ledges, and pretty much tossed any abuse I can manage at the 110 IS. I have washed and hosed the bike often, and tend to get a lot of water up on the headset. It has been thrown into Mother Natures wrath regularly, with extreme temperature swings, with rain, hail and snow (sometimes at the same time). The local trail conditions have lots of dust and fine sand, which always manages to find entry into almost anything. What all of this means is that the 110 IS having been through Hell and back, and has never been treated kindly, nor with much care or maintenance. Out of all this torture, it has shown no signs of anything, no wear or tear, it’s just working as it did from day one.

Truth be told, there really isn’t much to have an impression about, the 110 IS having worked flawlessly since I installed it, and morphed into the quiet background of bike use, and has hardly been noticed. I have used a couple of Cane Creeks other IS headsets, and they have either had a short shelf life or have broken.

110_last

Bottomline
The Cane Creek 110 IS has performed flawlessly from day one, and has never given me any issues. The 110 is the crown jewel of the Cane Creek headset line, and is meticulously built, with precision and exacting tolerances. It has been thrown into the Lion’s den of abuse, and neglect, and is still performing like it was brand new. It looks pretty, and the fit, finish is outstanding. In reality, there isn’t much to say about the Cane Creek 110 IS (obviously I am verbose), since it has done its job perfectly.

Strengths
-Precision workmanship
-Tight tolerances
-110 year warranty
-Performs flawlessly

Weaknesses
-Expensive
-Needs to include extra bearing cover o-rings

Overall Rating: 5 Flamin’ Chili Peppers

110 IS Specs
Size: 1 1/8 in. (28.6mm)
Stack Height: +1.0 mm to Cover Height
Top Stack Height: 17.0 mm
Bottom stack height: 10.3 mm
Material: Premium Headset Alloy 7075 T-6
Weight: 67.0 g – Tall/60.6 g – Short (excl. spacers and preload assembly)
Top bearing: Split-Lip Stainless Steel
Bottom bearing: Split-Lip Stainless Steel
Color: black, silver, blue, red, purple
Warranty: 110 years
MSRP: $150

Cane Creek 110 IS url: http://www.canecreek.com/component-headsets?browse=type&type=integrated-system

(Visited 7,039 times, 1 visits today)
About the author: Brian Mullin

Brian has been part of the Mtbr team since 2007, where he has become an integral member of the review and test staff, specializing in technical articles. He likes to push the limits in all the sports he obsesses in, whether it's mountain biking, whitewater kayaking, extreme skiing, or sport climbing. He takes those same strengths and a good dose of insanity to his reviewing and writing on mountain biking products, creating technical, in-depth and hyperbolic articles. Whenever he's not on the bike, he might be found watching MotoGP racing, otherwise look for him out on extremely technical singletrack.


Related Articles


NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • DJ says:

    I am not sure why this product is impressive. There is another company who make similar priced headsets that have been doing so longer that is better sealed and which almost every headset manufacturer now imulates including DiaCompe – Chris King. The integrated headset is not an effort to improve the bicycle or it’s parts, but rather the end result of the bicycle industry trying to simplify and reduce the number of precision components that make a bicycle and thus to offer a product less expensive to make for the same or increased price while implying an ‘unpgrade.’ As a former bicycle mechanic with more than a decade of experience I experienced the aheadset, suspension, aluminum, titainium, carbon and disk brake revolutions. None of those products came about purely from an altruistc want of the industry to make the cyclist happier, they all came from a want to make money selling. I speak on this subject both in terms of pro and con. I can see the reasons to simplify the bicycle in ways that help both the user and the maker and can hardly fault anyone for wanting to earn a living, but I wish the manufacturers were more honest about their reasons. I never tired of explaining to reps what they were actually selling and why. I have had the great advantage of working with and knowing welders, metalurgists and various engineers who share my passion for the sport and its equipment to bounce ideas off of concerning any number of bicycle concepts. Tubless tires for example are something that sells more $50(+) tires instead of $5 innertubes. There is a nominal improvement in ride quality, but the low pressures that no longer cause pinch flats now cause rim damage. I can adjust a lock nut headset so that it doesn’t come loose, would rather not have an integrated headset, lust after lugged steel road bikes and will probably never build a wheelset for personal use with tubeless rims. Then again I will never buy a pre-built wheel set for that matter. I can’t stand the way they feel and neither would you if you saw it my way. Just free advice (and rambling) – and worth every penny.

  • Cletis says:

    DJ, from reading your comments above, I get the impression you don’t share the profit motives of the bicycle component makers. Can I assume when you were a bicycle mechanic you worked for a bike shop? Did the owner of the shop pay you for your services? If so, where do you think your salary came from? One word, profit.
    Don’t worry though about the new Cane Creek 110 headset. I am sure as soon as the patent runs out in Sept 2010, you will see cheaper Chinese knock-offs showing up at a fraction of the price. For me, I think competition is good. This new headset will bring Cane Creek to the podium with Chris King and who knows what innovation will result from the competition. I was around before Aheadsets. I’ll take the aheadset over the lock nut headsets anyday. Cane Creek is an employee owned company. The 110 headset is manufactured in NC by good mountain folks. I ride with a Chris King on one of my bikes and it is great. I’ll ride with a Cane Creek 110 on the other bike and support both our “american made” companies. Keep the competition rolling!

  • Brian says:

    I only know one person who works for Cane Creek and he does it because he loves working for a small company that makes components for the sport he loves. If this company only cared about profits, it would be making all its components in another country where wages are far lower than the U.S. I have a Cane Creek headset that has outlasted two destroyed mountain bike frames and still works flawlessly on a third bike. Come to think of it, my friend at Cane Creek was the one who helped me install the headset on all 3 bikes.

  • Ken says:

    Cane Creek is no longer including aluminum Interlock spacers with the 110. They now only come with the black plastic spacers. The CC rep said that people and bike shops weren’t using them (something I find hard to believe).

  • Brian Mullin says:

    Hmmm, I am testing a new 110 tapered system and it comes with alloy spacers? I just checked with my inside line with Cane Creek and “The 110′s come with only a 2.5mm finishing spacer now. No plastic spacers… In fact, we’re eliminating the plastic spacers all together.”

  • Ed says:

    It’s a shame if CC is not sending the aluminum spacers anymore. I had them all (2, 5 and 10mm) set on my Mojo. Actually, I had to fill in with a couple more Hope spacers, since I don’t like to cut the steerer too short to invalidate the fork for other bikes. Anyway, I also find hard to believe they are not speccing the spacers because noboby was using them. They are indeed useful. Guess it’s more related to offer them aftermarket, though. Well, can’t blame them if CK and Hope also don’t offer any spacer with their headsets as well.

  • RubberBoy says:

    I have two 110. As far as I recall, they came with two aluminum spacers; 10mm and 2.5mm. The latter is necessary to turned the grooved top of the top cap into a flat surface.

    Cane also sold a separate kit with 20mm, 10mm, 5mm and 2.5mm spacers. They realized every setup required different spacers and now offers them individually. To me it makes most sense; presently, I need 2 x 10mm and 2 x 5mm, which in the past entailed 2 spacer kits; now I can purchase 4 spacers and be done with it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*