Lights Reviews and News


Review: Knog Blinder ARC 640


Knog from Australia makes a serious effort in lights with a staggering selection. Honest outputs, good beam patterns and the best form factors in the business are some of its virtues with this 640 as their brightest offering.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Lezyne Power Drive 900XL


Good optics, good price and form factor make this a good purchase as long as the customer is able to access the hidden Overdrive mode from right away.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Lupine Wilma 7


The Wilma 7 is the ‘practical’ exotic light of the Lupine line. Its incredible brightness is balanced out by light weight and good runtime. The new remote is a very welcome addition.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: CandlePower Tech TrailTorch TT3000


With the highest levels of U.S. craftsmanship, CandlePower Tech delivers a light with a very bright and even beam pattern. The GoPro compatible mounting is a big plus as well.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • geephlow says:

    I’ve been running the older model TT2200 for a couple of years. The quality and volume of light is confidence-inspiring for gnarly night-rides, and it’s held up well after a few seasons of heavy use in the wet, muddy PacNW. Customer service is also fantastic — these are people you want to do business with.

  • SJC says:

    N/A lumens? Did the light die?

  • TKK says:

    How can a con be “Not up to 3000 Lumen claims” when you have N/A for actual. I am interested in buying this light, so any info would be great

  • Craig says:

    I’m interested to know what the measured lumens are. The light looks to compete with the gloworm xs but i’d like to know how it fairs on the lumens. The beam pattern looks to be perfect

  • Craig says:

    Look to compete directly with the Gloworm XS but without lumen measurements hard to know. Can we get some more figures? Beam pattern looks to be amazing, i’m thinking of buying this light

  • Steve says:

    I’m a return buyer to this company. I had purchased their TT1800 a few years back and found that it fit the build for a high end light with quality output, meticulous build at a fairly reasonable price.. Recently, I purchases this light, the TT3000, and found it to be orders of magnitude better than the TT1800 in all respects even though the 1800 is a killer light for night riding. While I can’t authenticate the actual lumens, the beam pattern and throw is fantastic and a quantum leap above the1800. Strapped to my helmet, I can’t outrun the beam and the squared off pattern gives a very deep throw and a very even broad pattern that pushes back the darkness better than any lights I’ve seen. The battery packs are bullet proof, and I carry a backup in my camelback. Run times, at 40 degrees have exceeded an hour and a half without discharging the battery or it dropping down in brightness. Cabling is literally a snap and is uber high end.
    ALSO, I purchased their XFlare tail light (and a hundred other possible uses) and think it is in a class by itself as tail lights go. My riding buddies, like me, think it produces a demanding flash that simply cannot be ignore by any driver. It looks like you are coming up on a police cruiser with its light on. Everything these guys sell is top notch workmanship and avenues of communication are great. Like many readers I am baffled why MTBR does not list the actual lumen output for this product, but nonetheless, it works as promised where it is most needed… in the utter and complete darkness of the deep woods

  • Bull says:

    FYI, per their store, they are sold out until Fall 2016.

  • Craig says:

    Measure the lumens already….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Sigma Buster 600


The Buster 600 puts out an honest 600 Lumens in a handy, no frills package for $90. Impressed with this offering from Sigma of Germany.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: DiNotte XML-3


The XML-3 is light at 355 grams, bright at 1573 Lumens yet it does not break the bank at $229.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Tim M says:

    I researched for months before buying a light, and this was my choice. I consider it the best for price, weight, brightness, and run time. Excellent customer service as well. Very pleased

  • Craig says:

    I have a pair of DiNotte XML-3 lights that I have used for two years now. One on the helmet and one on the bars. I have no clue how many hours I have on them, but it’s a whole lot. I have many, many night rides and who knows how many pre-dawn rides lasting between 1.5 and 2.5 hours each.

    I can’t begin to say how extraordinarily pleased that I am with these lights. They have survived cold winter rides and blistering Texas summer rides. I have used them on road bikes, but mostly mountain biking. They have been used in daytime for awareness on road rides in 100+ degree days for hours.

    Only now am I beginning to see battery duration decline. It actually seems to have come on pretty quickly, but it’s manageable. I need to start thinking about battery replacement. These replacement batteries are not cheap, but they have delivered many dependable hours of riding.

    They get my highest rating!

  • Dave O says:

    When you say the beam has an excellent color, is it less blue than some of the other lights, more like a neutral white?

  • Corbinworks says:

    I have this light, Dinotte has it listed as 2000lm not 1600lm
    Do we have an updated test showing the 2000lm’s?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Light & Motion Urban 850 Trail


This latest Urban 850 Trail model remains very bright and light. Now the side lights have been turned down to optimize for trail use. GoPro mount compatibility is offered now as well.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Lupine NEO 2


At 188 grams, it is the ideal helmet light with the battery mounted at the rear of the helmet to provide balance to the light head up front.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Lezyne Deca Drive 1500XXL


Lezyne made their mark with honest, infinite battery lights. But with the dangers of loose Lithium cells, they are going with sleeker and more compact designs.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • SuperficialDorkOnBike says:

    Well, now Lezyne is like many other and can be bunch in with them. The lack of a replaceable battery in the field was a big selling point for me. I was willing to pay a little more for that.

    While not field replaceable, most of the Lezyne lights can have the battery replaced. You just have to want to take the light apart. I have done it one my micro drives models.

  • SGK says:

    Lezyne lights are great…when they work. I’ve had multiple fails with a Super Drive and bad battery with a Mega Drive. Customer support was okay, but never solved the battery issue. It’s hard to go night riding with a light you don’t really trust.

  • AC says:

    I’ve seen mixed reviews on the battery issue. Many claim the Year 9 Power Drive XL 900 has a user-replaceable battery, but not the Macro Drive 600 XL, for example. Does anyone know if either of those models have a user-replaceable battery or not?

  • Brian says:

    Francis, was the 1390 measured lumens in race mode or regular mode?

  • Aaron says:

    I have used alot cheap lights and they only put out white lite. The white light just washes out the ground. I use mine on endure mode and it last 3hr for my 25 mile mountain bike ride.

  • Zvi says:

    Bought two Deca drive 1500 XXL lights via EBAY. Both are not working, one after a year and the other one after half of a year. Contacted Lezyne but they renounced.
    After using rechargeable batteries lights for many years I came into conclusion that this technology is not reliable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: CatEye Volt 1600


The Volt 1600 continues to be one of our favorites as the output bumps up to 1600 Lumens now. Chassis and mount are getting a bit dated now for this much light but this is still a self-contained powerhouse.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: NiteRider Lumina OLED 800


This latest Lumina bumps output to an honest 800 Lumens. It also incorporates an OLED display to make switching through modes very easy. Finding out remaining runtime on any light level is handy as well.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • John says:

    Heading into my third (or is it fourth?) winter with 2 Lumina 650’s. Still holding a charge, and producing all the light I need. They have survived some hard falls without issue. Small, low weight, sufficient light, durable, and made in America. What’s not to like?

  • The Geezer says:

    I have used a NiteRider Lumina 650 for a couple of years. I use it mostly on “walking” mode. It will run for hours without reaching the recharge indication. All good, highly recommend these lights.

  • Jeff in Napa says:

    I have three of their lights a mi-newt 600 , lumina 700 and a lumina 750 that I am nothing but pleased with . 95 % of my riding is in the dark usually the Veeder loop here in Napa where it’s pitch black and I have more light than I actually need running two on low just incase one were to quit working .. The mi-newt is a few years old and has been charged at least 500 cycles and still works fine which is pretty amazing …. Money well spent !!

  • Kevin says:

    I have a older Tri-Newt and it works well. I use it on my handlebar and mount the large battery in a water bottle and put it in the water bottle cage. I also have a Lumina 750 that I run on the helmet that is very light and I enhanced the helmet straps with two zip ties. I use that helmet only for night riding. Both lights have been flawless, bright, dependable, and well built.

  • Garyh | Australia says:

    Que??
    Under Minuses… “OLED does not display charging status ”
    This is not correct. A running bar shows the battery is undergoing charge, and when disconnected and turned on, the percentage of charge and corresponding bar representation is also shown. In what context, and when has the published observation been made?

    • Francis Cebedo says:

      >> Que??

      When charging, it should display the current % charge on the battery. This is how other lights with OLED function.

  • patrick says:

    had the reg lunina 600 and now the oled 600….love them both…the oled ins smaller in length, looks great and is fun to use….my only disappointment is it doesn’t have the hyper flash that’s great for intersections….it has 4 flash modes that all seem to be very similar and slow…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Cygolite Dash 450


The Dash 450 from Cygolite offers a unique form factor with four auxiliary LEDs to complement the main lens.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Bontrager Ion 700 RT


Going up in price with a sophisticated remote, the Ion 700 RT is the same compact light that can now be part of a unified system of lights.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Chad says:

    Small correction for the article. There is a helmet mount available for the 700 Ion now.
    http://www.bontrager.com/model/13492

  • don says:

    There is also a “blendr” accessory available by bontrager that lets you mount and vertically pivot the light when attached to a stem. Still one of the best lights at 50% of a car headlight’s power output. There is a non RT (remote transmission) white ion700 for about 30 dollars less.

  • David Wayne says:

    700 lumens is irrelevant in my book. The main attraction to this light is remote control so you can quickly turn it off when riding into a jogger, hiker, walker in the dark on a trail. How many people swear at you when your head lights blind them. That’s why I purchased this set of 700RT, tail light and remote.
    But, sadly, there are problems with 700 RT. Northwest rain, I think, leaked into the tail light and now it’s useless. That’s OK, I thought. The head light works remotely and that’s the main thing. But I found that battery would die without notice, three times. Third time, I have been unable to recharge 700 RT. Trek makes great bikes. But they don’t know how to make great bike lights, yet. It’s a great, great idea. Very needed, I think.

  • David Weir says:

    when I use the ion700Rt it gets quite hot when it is let on ridding for say more than a few minutes is this typical for this unit to get hot

  • Manny says:

    I had issues with the lights randomly blinking, turning themselves on, 2.5 hours or less duration for the headlight (lowest setting), and water shorting out my rear light in Japan. (It was not the recall series) Bontrager changed out the set when I returned. Though not sure if lights will turn on again on their own (could have been a frequency issue in Japan?) they definitely changed the rubber cover on the rear lights charging port as it’s beefier and less flimsy . I hope the headlight has a longer illum time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: CatEye Volt 6000


The brightest light we’ve ever tested also has the widest beam. And it has a trick up its sleeve, an integrated cooling fan. But is it flawed or perfect for trail use?

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • SGK says:

    This lumen war is getting silly and dangerous. Blind cars, trail user… I could see some user getting sued by blinding some causing the to fall.

  • toddonbike says:

    The cool thing about night riding is riding in the dark. With all these high lumen lights around it could be brighter than daylight. I guess it just goes along with everybody taming down the trails. This sport is just getting too easy.

    • Francis Cebedo says:

      >>The cool thing about night riding is riding in the dark.

      Maybe. But really, the cool thing about night riding is you get to ride your bike when the days are so short.

      This has nothing to do with taming trails.

      This is all about choice. Just like having those very capable full-suspension bikes. It’s good that riders have the choice to ride fast and at a very high level. Or the rider can choose a hardtail and a 400 lumen light. That’s fine as well.

  • NotAnotherHill says:

    I appreciate the reviews, but why don’t you test the light output at multiple levels? Also test the actual run time, preferably at multiple levels. This would be very useful information.

  • Francis Cebedo says:

    >>I appreciate the reviews, but why don’t you test the light output at multiple levels? Also test the actual run time, preferably at multiple levels. This would be very useful information.

    We used to test output levels but they are very random among manufacturers. Some have two and others have five. Some have medium at 50%. Or 60% or 30% so it ends up not being useful.

    Run time is a cluster too. There is no good standard when the light is considered dead. Some shut the light down at 80% brightness, some at 50%. Some step down the light to the lower level.

  • Catmando says:

    The tech behind this lamp I find intriguing. Looks like it is using some sort of massive sized emitter. I can’t help but wonder why Cateye figured someone might want a lamp with 6000 lumen of output that is basically a flood beam pattern ( or so I’m led to believe ). My experience with any type of bike light tells me that if you are going to create a VERY bright bike light MOST of that light should project into the distance. Too much light in the foreground and the reflective bounce back glare becomes detrimental. At 6K lumen I can only imagine how annoying that would be. Maybe if Cateye cuts back the output and creates a lamp with more distance throw it might actually be worth buying.

    • BlackBean says:

      Spot lights are for fast riding, and mostly road riding because you move much faster than on the mountain. For mountain biking, a flood beam is much better. This light was made with mountain bikers in mind.

      • BigDaddy says:

        “Catmando” is correct–This light has WAY TOO MUCH light in the foreground at the highest power setting and it’s easy to outrun this light due to the lack of throw. I think the biggest deal-breaker, however, is the incredibly noisy fan that is always running at the same setting regardless of power level. Yes, it’s THAT loud.

  • fasterjason says:

    The original Cateye Stadium came out around 1998, it was about 500-600 lumen and took about eight hours to charge, ballast was integrated (hard to fit in a frame) .
    The Cateye Stadium 3 came out in 2000, and had 1500 lumen and a three hour charge time, ballast was separate.
    I had both and the Stadium 3 was a game changer. Still have my Stadium 3 and it still works, just not as bright and run time is two hours now. Not bad for a 15 year old light.

  • Jeremy Ellis says:

    Francis,
    Can you please set ALL of your lights up at once? If you have a library system set up, I would like to “check out” this light for use. 🙂

  • CaveMan says:

    I use a combo of Maxx -D and Volt 1600 to give me the throw and width I need. Both come in way under the cost of the volt 6000 and are more than sufficient for lighting up pitch black complex trails. I cannot help thinking Cateye have gone overboard with this one but at least they are innovating. The price rules out normal consumers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: Lupine Piko 4 Smartcore


From its humble beginnings of 550 Lumens, the new Lupine Piko 4 now sports 1500 Lumens, a wireless remote and smartphone app.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Review: CandlePower Tech TrailTorch TT3000


With the highest levels of US craftsmanship, CandlePower Tech delivers a light with a very bright and even beam pattern. The GoPro compatible mounting is a big plus as well.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • MBR says:

    Run time on high for almost all these mega bright lights would get you thru about one nighttime lap at a 24 hour race. Please, please, please provide run times at other lower power settings.

  • visegripmikey says:

    Most lights that are just high/medium/low are typically 50% medium, Low 25%. So with this light 750 lumens on low will get you about 6 hours.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

2016 Bike Lights Shootout: Headlights


2016 is an exciting year for lights with brighter lights, more affordable options and new features such as wireless. Check back often to see the latest lights reviews.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Peper says:

    I love the NightRider lights. 700 Lumina on helmet and Pro 2400 on bars. Puts out sooo much light on high that you can actually see the leaves wilting on the trees and bushes next to the trail…..JK You can’t out run the lights.

  • Matt says:

    I’m surprised the latest 2016 XML-3 Dinotte was not included. I know it’s listed as a 2016 but I believe the 2015 was tested in this review. The 2016 version now produces 2,000+ claimed lumens with 2.5hrs claimed on high and 1,400 lumens on medium with 5hrs runtime. That runtime is exactly what I need and it’s still in the same small form factor light head and battery. The new battery has 10% more claimed capacity and I’ve been wanting to buy a second battery for a long time. I think this is the push I needed. It should take my 2015 XML-3 at 1,500 lumens up to at least 4hrs if not 4.5hrs on high. Knowing myself, I’ll probably buy the second battery…. with a new 2016 light head attached lol.

    The reason I didn’t buy the more powerful XML-4 was that it was a little bigger (not a deal breaker by any means), but it also used the same battery and had a considerably shorter runtime which was the deal breaker. 1.5hrs and 2,100 lumens or 3hrs and 2,000 lumens and $30 cheaper . Easy choice. I wonder if the XML-4 is going to get the same update treatment.

    I also love my Lumina for helmet mount, I don’t think it gets any better when all things are considered but I like my Dinotte considerably better for the bars over anything I’ve owned from Niterider. I feel like Dinotte is really over engineered and I like that the LEDs are only run a 50% capacity when on high. I guess that’s why they run 3-4 LEDs where some use only one of the same type of LED for similar output. But, to be fair, all of my Niteriders have been flawless as has my Dinotte. Not to start a Dinotte vs Niterider war, both are very good lights and both excel in different areas.

  • bike rider says:

    What happened to the Bar Charts you used to have? Price, $ per gram, lumens per gram, lumens per $, stuff like that? Did you get in trouble with the manufacturers? 😀

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

2016 Bike Lights Shootout: Lumen Measurements


Mtbr measures actual Lumen output of bike lights by going to special laboratories that have an integrating sphere to measure actual Lumen output. See all the Lumen graphs here.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

2016 Bike Lights Shootout: Beam Patterns


A picture is worth a thousand words right? And with bike lights, beam pattern photos tell a very good story. See all the beam pattern photos here.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • JIM says:

    curious why the beam shot backyard photo of the cateye volt 800 does not even come close to the light and motion urban 850 trail or the niterider oled 800 yet they all tested around 800 lumens thanks for your time

    • Francis Cebedo says:

      JIM, not sure but shall doublecheck and reshoot. The Volt has narrower bearm pattern and it may be aimed too high in this photoshoot, putting most of its light on the tree above.

  • Craig Ricker says:

    The Candlepower TT3000, looks to have very little light in comparison to the TrailLED DS, although both are supposedly rated at 3000 lumens. What is the actual output of the TT3000?

    • Elvis Tam says:

      I had the same reaction as well. Also why is the Candlepower the only one that is shot much closer then the other ones that have equal lumen supposedly?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

2015 Bike Lights Shootout


The 2015 Bike Lights Shootout is here! It is quite an exciting crop of lights as lights are getting lighter with improved beam patterns. Check back often to see the latest lights reviews.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Pascal Laverdure says:

    Like to see the shootout, but it is a lot of info to go thru. Do you to a summary for specifically what to look for, best versus best value with top threes in say 100, 500, 1500 and 2000+ categories? Unfortunately I can’t read thru all patterns, lumens tests and reviews to see which are worth looking at…thanks!

  • sp00n says:

    Can you replace the graphs with larger versions that are actually readable? Even the ones in the gallery are too small to read (e.g. the Lumens per Dollar).

  • Headfirst! says:

    I’ll have to admit, I’m pretty ridiculous with my MTB expenditures, and when everyone was taping flashlights to their bike, I was hopping on the wagon with the magicshine mj808 on my helmet, and (I can’t remember the model number) the three cluster light on my handlebar. That seems like so long ago, and I’ve since upgraded to the one that looks like two owl eyes (forgot that model number too), but I’ll never forget my first ride with the Trail LED Halo! My friends used to say that I looked like a freight train coming through the woods…now they really don’t have words to describe except some guys have started riding that never had, and still don’t have lights, and they just go off of the light I’m putting out. Now I still run the highest power magicshine that I have (I think it was claimed 2200 lumens), and I believe in running a handlebar mount because it’s always pointed where your bike is, but the Halo absolutely drowns it out! The reason I believe in running both is because you’re supposed to look ahead at what you are going to ride in 30-40 feet, not right down at your wheel. With that combo, I ride like it’s daytime…that’s the best way I can put it. It’s daylight!

    Here’s the drawbacks…you constantly have to turn it down so you don’t (literally) blind your riding mates when you pause. It takes a little while to get the mounting right, and it was worth getting a different helmet to just leave it on there and have that as my night riding helmet. Lastly, if there’s a lot of fog or a lot of dust, it’s kinda like driving a car in dense fog or snowfall…it does no good to run high beams. But, turning the intensity down helps quite a bit.

    Notice I didn’t put the price down as a shortcoming. I think for something as powerful, fast charging (you could ur a 24 hour race with just two packs with the 1:1 charging time), excellent clearance over your head, and basically more light than your car will produce with the brights on, it’s worth every bit! Besides, it’s a quality product made right here in the US! No, I’m not a spokesperson not am I profiting from this post, but it’s worth looking at any of the Trail LED products, and it’s hard to believe the Halo isn’t in this shootout. Why would the guys that make cheaper products try to replicate it of it’s not on this review, setting the bar for bike light performace since it has been in production?!

  • Bill says:

    Dynamo lights are finally getting useful for my old eyes; I’d love to see a section on them and another on rear/turn signal lights. Thanks for your work!

  • Richard says:

    I was wondering about LED color. Higher lumen levels with no cost increase can be achieved simply by using a bluer LED. I find the blue colors to make it difficult to discern detail even though the lumen levels are higher. Are all of these lights comparable with respect to their LED color? Thanks!

  • bbb says:

    I really appreciate the amount of effort that goes into these shootouts, but holy crap is this a lot of data to go though. A table format like the one they use at OutdoorGearLab would be really nice for this. I also think it would be really helpful to only list (or list separately) the lights for actual trail riding, as that is (probably) what most of us are interested in. Tail lights, commuter lights, and other “to be seen” equipment are all pretty standard stuff (basically anything will work), and not really that useful for mountain biking.

    It would also be great to have more info regarding helmet mounting options. I’ve tried riding with lights on the bars, but to me they’re borderline useless if you have a decent helmet light, especially on twisty/technical trails, plus helmet lights allow you to look further out or closer in depending on your speed, which you can’t do at all with bar lights. A good, low(ish) profile, easy-to-use helmet mount is worth a lot to me.

    It would be great to have something like “best helmet mount”, or “best buy if you’re only using one light”.

    But enough of that. It’s a really impressive shootout you put together and the data is very helpful. Just some thoughts/wishes, maybe for next year (take it or leave it).

  • Brent says:

    It would be great to know which lights have available mounts to fit 35mm bars!

  • BenH says:

    A review score sorted summary would be great. It’s awesome so many lights were reviewed by it’s pretty difficult to find the 5 chilis reviews and there are just too many lights to go through them all.

  • Craig says:

    I really like the annual light shootout. I do however miss the tunnel photos. They are much easier to compare the lights. The yard shot is too close to the fence to compare the brighter lights.
    Thanks MTBR

  • bill says:

    great reviews! I would also love to see a comparison chart for battery life. I’m shopping for a light that will work 8+ hours

  • Camden says:

    You forgot at least one! What about Klarus?

  • Lynn says:

    Hope everything goes well.

    This is Lynn, from Marketing Department of WowsBox. We see your professional review about bike headlight, just wondering would you like to try our new developed headlight stand and help to make a review for us? http://amzn.to/2p8eikd

    Sincerely hope we will have the opportunity to cooperate with you. Please kindly let us know your US address if you are interested in, we will send the sample out. We will be really appreciated for your kind reply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Interbike 2015: CatEye Volt 6000 is the brightest light today


One of our Interbike highlights is this devastatingly bright light from CatEye, the Volt 6000. It also integrates an incredible cooling system.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • tb says:

    This is too expensive.

  • Lenny says:

    It is really TOO EXPENSIVE! I ride fast trails at night, twice a week, and my set up is a 2200 lumen light on my bars and a 700 lumen on my helmet. Plenty of light. The Volt 6000 must be really nice to have but at £541.66, it is far too costly!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Lupine Lighting Interbike 2015


Lupine’s new range of lights continues to impress with increased brightness and longer battery life for 2016. They’ve also mixed things up with a new smartphone app and battery packs capable of charting USB devices.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Eurobike 2015: Lupine shows off Bluetooth controlled lights


With the addition of new connectivity features, the Pico, Wilma and Betty lights can now all be manipulated with a single handlebar-mounted remote device.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Eurobike 2015: Hope unveils cassette, lights, seatpost and more


British bike parts maker’s portfolio expands in multiple exciting directions, including an eye-catching series of orange anodized components.

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Chris I says:

    Liking this. Will Hope be developing its own chain as well to go with the NW rings and new cassette?

  • Natalia says:

    Would love to see more information about the hub conversion spacers and end-caps from non-boost to boost. I wonder if the 3mm variance in the cassette placement will be a big issue, especially with 3.0 inch tires. Maybe they’ll solve it with a new freehub body and offset lockring.

  • KWL says:

    Hope seriously needs to improve the durability of their hubs. I had one completely blow up after less than a year of use. I know others that had the same thing happen. I’ll never touch another Hope Hub until it has been demonstrated its reliability.

    • lkspoke says:

      How did your hub “Blow up” ? Was it bearing issues, or freehub body issues?? I ask as I have used (abused) a set for over 2 years and have had no issues. I ride mostly single track in the mid-west that is semi aggressive terrain.

  • Rob says:

    Really looking forward this wide 10 speed cassette. The weight is perfect — much less than SunRace, and comparable to Praxis.

  • Leroy says:

    I have had 3 sets of Hope Pro EVO Hubs with only One issue on each set. I cracked the aluminum cassette body and had to start using the steel ones. Otherwise the hubs have been bombproof, even riding in mud, creeks, etc. And I’m an aggressive 220 lbs rider. For the price you can’t beat their hubs in my opinion.

  • kenjoh says:

    Hope hubs do not blow up, been using their hubs for 15 years, never had any failure despite some very punishing runs in the Alps, Italy, on mostly downhill-enduro trails.Totally bombproof.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Eurobike 2015: Lezyne offers higher powered lights and updates on pump head


Some new lights, a major upgrade for existing ones. The ABS2 pump head is an improved version of the time saving ABS pump head and now adapts more easy between Schrader and Presta valves. And… great news for tall people!

Read More »

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • sgerecke says:

    It’s nice to know that Lezyne has introduced a pump head to replace the one that is total garbage that came on two pumps I have now. It’s also nice to know that I can buy that for $17.99 each. What was wrong with the flip lever pump head that every pump I’ve ever had came with?

    • CycleCross Madman says:

      Looks like Lezyne is knocking of Birzman now. Nice pump head guys. Really, couldn’t come up with something original yourselves?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*


THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.