Enduro Compare-O Bottom Line: Intense’s Carbine 29 knows how to go big, fast and fun

29er Enduro Enduro Compare-O 2014

This article is part of the Mtbr’s Enduro Compare-O. See all the stories in this special section here–http://reviews.mtbr.com/category/enduro-compare-o-2014

In our First Look at the Carbine 29 we remarked at how refreshingly clutter-free Intense made the handlebar on this bike. No suspension lockouts, no electronics, no front shifter—and only a single clamp on each side, due to judicious use of SRAM’s Matchmaker hardware. Essentially three buttons, two levers and a whole lot less on the brain. Beautiful. That said, we now feel the Carbine 29 should probably come with one more control—an Easy Button, because that’s how it feels to ride this bike.

Whether bombing descents, huffing up long climbs or taking it airborne, our test riders found the Carbine a comfortable, easy whip to command. And while a couple of the 29ers in our test instill similar confidence, they do so by more-or-less muting-out the bike. The Intense, on the other hand, manages to instill a sense of self-assurance while still keeping things exciting.

“There’s something about the Carbine that feels like an old friend—I was immediately comfortable, but it wasn’t that numb, passionless feeling,” said one test rider. “I felt I was in control despite being on the ragged edge of chaos.”

Going downhill fast—in the good way

It should come as no surprise that the Carbine Pac-Mans chunky downhill terrain. Its 29-inch wheels combined with 140mm of Virtual Pivot Point (VPP) commanded rear suspension in combination with a buttery smooth RockShox Pike 160mm-travel fork gives the bike a luxurious but responsive ride quality. What did surprise, however, was what happened when the Carbine left the ground.

Photo by Sean McLaughlin.

“After gobbling up the chunky sections like a trophy truck, I expected the Carbine to flatten out the lips and just kind of swallow on jumps,” said one rider. “Instead, I the Carbine snaps into the air confidently and lands with a certain sure-footed authority.”

On the up and up

Equally surprising was the way the Carbine 29 climbed. At 28 pounds, the Intense is respectable for its gravity-biased ambitions, but not a lightweight. On long ascents the Easy Button analogy again comes to mind as the bike pedals with a certain lightness and efficiency. It’s not at-the-front-of-the-pack speed, but its right there in the second group ahead of all the other big bikes, and without all the whining.

The Carbine 29 shines on technical climbs as well, charging up and over rock gardens, big logs and other “no way” obstacles like Godzilla stomping out Japan—the attack angle-limiting wheels working in tandem with the supple suspension to claw spin and lift over the gnar. Once you trust the bike enough to keep pedaling in the face of iffy-ness, the Carbine rewards you with pull-through.

There seems to be a misunderstanding

Having looked at the Carbine’s specs the night before our test, one of our riders determined that the bike’s long wheelbase and chainstays should result in a stable but poor maneuvering ride. Indeed, the Carbine both looks big and puts big numbers up on the spec sheet, but what that test rider—and the other six-foot-or-taller riders who signed up to ride the bike—didn’t realize is our Intense was actually a medium-sized frame, not large as they had presumed.

A well-hidden grey-on-black frame decal indicating its size went unnoticed, tricking the riders into riding a frame size they normally wouldn’t consider. More than that, the misread ended up being a blessing in disguise.

“Honestly I thought you were joking when you said it was a medium,” said one test rider. “Had I known before hand, I probably would have dismissed it. I’m glad I didn’t, because this was my favorite bike in the test.’”

While both bikes have a longish 17.75-inch large chainstay length, the wheelbase of the medium Carbine 29 is 46-inches, a full inch shorter than its size large brethren. While the large’s 47-inch wheelbase would have been the longest, and theoretically most unwieldy, in our entire test, the medium is about average for the 29ers and is actually shorter than a few of the 27.5-inch bikes. On the trail, it made for a maneuverable ride.

“I expected the Carbine 29 to be stable in the wide sweepers—which it was—but where it surprised me was tighter turns,” commented one rider. “There’s a 180 hairpin around a fence post I only make about 50 percent of the time on my 26er that I made on the first attempt with the Carbine. I went back and did it two more times just to confirm it wasn’t a fluke. It wasn’t.”

Continue to Page 2 for more on the Intense Carbine 29 and full photo gallery »
About the author: Don Palermini

Chicago-born editorial director Don Palermini became a cycling-based life-form in the sixth grade after completing a family road bike tour of his home state. Three years later he bought his first mountain bike to help mitigate the city's pothole-strewn streets, and began exploring the region's unpaved roads and trails. Those rides sparked a much larger journey which includes all manner of bike racing, commuting, on- and off-road bike advocacy, and a 20-plus-year marketing career in the cycling industry. Now residing in the San Francisco Bay Area and pedaling for Mtbr, his four favorite words in the English language are "breakfast served all day," together in that order.


(Visited 11,611 times, 10 visits today)

Related Articles


NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • TJ says:

    Since when are 740mm bars narrow? Must have missed that memo.

    • Mtbr says:

      TJ- Bars are getting wider all the time, and though it used to be a DH fanboy fad, those of us riding all-mountain and trail bikes–particularly 29ers–are finding wider bars help with leverage when steering, making the bike slightly easier to press into turns.

  • Scott says:

    All the reasons you listed, are exactly why I built one of these. It climbs better than my previous 4″ 29er, and descends closer to my 6″ El Guapo. The only drawback is that the lower pivot pretty much eliminates the ability to run a 2x chain guide. I’m still not totally in love with 1x drive trains because of the limitations at either end. The bike geometry, weight, stiffness, and surprising maneuverability were the selling points.

  • Ben says:

    Scott, what size did you go with and how tall are you?

  • Sean says:

    It comes from Intense with High Roller II’s, but there is a Schwalbe Nobby Nic on the front in the pictures. Which tire did you prefer, and why the swap?

  • Eric says:

    Do you know what the inseam measurements are on the taller test riders? I’m about 6′, but my inseam is around 35.” I’ve been looking at large frames that run larger. Thankd for the heads up on the sizing!

  • Alex Bo B'Alex says:

    Don Palermini,
    I thought you were going to feature the x-fusion hilo sls on the carbine 29er? Or is the article exclusively going to talk about just the sls?

  • Dongoose says:

    Alex-
    I like your attention to details! The X-Fusion Hilo SLS is installed on the Carbine 29 currently and I just put some miles on it this evening. For the review above we rode the bike as spec’d by Intense with the RS Reverb. I want to log some serious miles on the SLS before writing about it, because as you likely know, all posts work well for the first few weeks…what makes a good one is how it responds to crummy conditions and how it works (or doesn’t) over time.
    Stay tuned.
    Don

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*