Giant Fully Commited to 27.5 for 2014

27.5 News
Official Liv/giant 27.5 Women’s Bikes Press Release

Liv/giant Unveils World’s First Full Range of Women’s-Specific 27.5 Off-Road Bikes
With all-new 27.5 performance bikes for XC, trail and enduro riding, Liv/giant delivers superior fit and performance to female off-road riders

Liv/giant, the cycling brand dedicated to female riders, today unveiled the world’s first full lineup of women’s-specific off-road bike featuring 27.5-inch wheel technology. With new XC, trail and enduro bikes, in both composite and aluminum frame options, Liv/giant is making a major commitment to helping female riders enjoy a better fit and superior performance on the trail.

For 2014, a total of five new Liv/giant series and 13 global models feature 27.5-inch wheel technology. Each of the new bikes has been in development for the past two years, and several have already been ridden to major race wins by Liv/giant athletes who played key roles in developing them.

“Our research led us to believe that the 27.5-inch wheel platform offers an ideal way to reduce overall bike weight, improve efficiency, and deliver better control for female riders,” said Liv/giant product developer Abby Santurbane. “We worked with a team of pro riders who confirmed those benefits and more.”

When combined with Liv/giant’s 3F (Fit, Form, Function) women’s-specific fit geometry, the 27.5 bikes—each of them purpose-built for a particular terrain and riding style—grant the traction and stability of 29er bikes but without the compromises in fit and weight. The new 27.5-optimized frames offer more stand-over clearance and a shorter wheelbase to improve a rider’s control and confidence.

One of the athletes riding an early prototype model was road and cyclocross world champion Marianne Vos, who is racing select XC events this year in a build-up to the 2016 Olympic Games. Vos rode a prototype Obsess Advanced model—the world’s first women’s-specific XC-focused 27.5 composite hardtail—to wins in XC and short track at the Sea Otter Classic in April.

“Some of my teammates had been racing on 29er bikes, which offer some added stability, but for many women riders the large wheels present a challenge,” said Vos. “The 27.5 feels just right. It’s quick and light the way I want it to be, but also has better control and stability than the 26-inch-wheel bikes I’ve ridden. I don’t have to put as much effort into going fast on my 27.5-inch bike. It’s effortless.” Along with Vos, U23 XC World Champion Jolanda Neff has also played a major role in helping test and refine the 2014 Obsess Advanced.

For more technical XC terrain, Liv/giant developed Lust Advanced, the world’s first women’s-specific, full-suspension composite 27.5-inch bike. The Lust Advanced is Liv/giant’s flagship bike, designed for the most discerning XC and trail riders. It features an Advanced-grade composite frame and Maestro Suspension technology with 4 inches of travel. The Lust series is also offered in a lightweight ALUXX SL aluminum frame.

For aggressive trail and enduro riding, Liv/giant is introducing Intrigue, which features 5.5 inches of Maestro rear suspension technology and an ALUXX SL aluminum frame. Giant Factory Off-Road Team rider Kelli Emmett helped develop both the Lust and Intrigue platforms, and she has been competing on both at XC and enduro events.

“The difference with 27.5 is really incredible,” said Emmett. “In both the Lust and the Intrigue, I can immediately feel the boost in quickness and my ability to maneuver the bike. For XC racing with Lust Advanced, the fit and acceleration is so much better than a 29er. And for enduro racing with the Intrigue, it’s a perfect blend of stability, control, and agility to easily handle any terrain on the course.”

In addition to all the new performance models, Liv/giant makes 27.5 technology available to more women riders with a full line of 27.5 aluminum hardtail bikes called Tempt. The Tempt series is ideal for beginning and sport-level mountain bike riders, and features a low standover height and excellent fit.

For 2014, Liv/giant is offering the following off-road series with 27.5 technology:

Obsess Advanced (Advanced-grade composite hardtail XC)
Lust Advanced (Advanced-grade composite full-suspension XC)
Lust (ALUXX SL aluminum full-suspension XC)
Intrigue (ALUXX SL aluminum full-suspension trail and enduro)
Tempt (ALUXX aluminum hardtail XC)

The 2014 Liv/giant 27.5 off-road bikes will be available later this summer through Giant and Liv/giant retailers.

About the author: Gregg Kato

Gregg Kato studied journalism and broadcasting in college while working many different jobs including deejaying, driving a forklift and building web sites (not all at the same time). Kato enjoys riding local Santa Cruz trails. Besides being an avid mountain biker, he is also a motorcycle fanatic. Two wheels, one Passion.

Related Articles

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:

Wordpress Comments:

  • Luiggi says:

    Yeah, right. All the major players needed to segment the market and force us to upgrade/update our bikes because the bikes/frames were so good that we were all happy with our current bike, and nobody was buying a newer model. And yet they want to convince us it was for our own good. I’ve tried four 650b bikes, and in my humble opinion they aren’t as playful and nimble as my 26ers. Now if I’d like to upgrade my frame for a newer model, I’d have to buy a new set of wheels, a new fork, etc.

    Cool infomercial, but I still believe this isn’t in our best interests, but in the commercial ones (i.e. maximize revenues) of the bike industry.

  • John Park says:

    Wheel diameter has no bearing upon acceleration. If the rim and tire are the same weight the larger wheel will also be rotating slower; the effects cancel out. In order to get to the same rpm will take more energy, but that’s not the comparative case here.

    If you use the same type of rim and tire, the net overall [rotating and non rotating bike plus rider] acceleration loss between 27.5 and 29 is about .15% or one six hundredth difference. Plus the bike will be about a third of a pound heavier.

    There may be valid reasons for going 27.5 but noticeable differences in acceleration are hard to measure.

    • Ryan says:

      odd, since 29ers are noticeably more sluggish.

    • Chris says:

      Wheel diameter makes no difference to acceleration?? That’s flat out wrong mate, I’m sorry.

      A smaller diameter wheel in effect changes the “final drive ratio”…. and 1.5″ most certainly would make a difference.

      But dont take my word for it, just google “rolling diameter” and its effects on acceleration- and you will quickly find a lot of motor racing references proving my point. 1″ bigger on a car makes a difference…. so on a bike with only your own 2 legs, its even more noticeable.

  • the-one1 says:

    “superior technology”. WTF is that suppose to mean. It’s just a wheel of a larger diameter. The wheel was a “superior technology”, everything after that is just fluff.

  • Rideordie says:

    What the fail to mention is that all the slight differences in percentage points we because 650b isn’t really a 27.5 more like 27.125 making there arguments moot. Imma hold out for the 31ers. Now that’s a monster truck mobbing down the trail.

  • Rideordie says:

    Predictive text arrrrr what they fail… points are there their

  • EagleScout says:

    I did notice a BIG difference from 26 to 29. The 29 doesent handle well in twisty sections, Its seems to make me go slower. But it also seems like I can climb up hills and ride rock gardens with less effort on a 29.

  • Brooks Yancey says:

    What a $%^&*#@ load. 2% here, 1.5% there. Here’s a stat for you, 95% of riders out there with suspension forks don’t even know what their settings are, they just ride. All of this sounds like an attempt to over hype bikes that will ride poorly.

    • Dr Dog says:

      I tried a 650B frnt wheel with good results over 3 years ago. Also found that many cross country racers were secretly using this combo on some courses with great effect (some in spite of sponsors not having a 27) .
      Three years later I have given away a 29er, only will ride my 26 as an indoor trainer!
      On my third 27.5 conversion, & find them completely superior to the original designed for 26, except climbing on pavement!
      Finally as Scott won almost every 2012 cup race with a 650 (they did-NOT even have a 650 production bike at the time!) & many other XC wins later (Sea Otter 2013), I can have a 5″ travel bike made for 27.5!!!
      Ride what you like, but I will never ever ride a 26er off-road again!

  • Acupunk says:

    Here is what it comes down to: Ride the bike. If it fits you and “disappears” underneath you then buy it. Who cares what wheel size? I compared the Santa Cruz Bronson, the Tallboy LTc and Tallboy at a demo day recently. The Bronson felt more balanced and fluid of the 3 bikes. While I loved how the 29r’s rolled through the rock gardens I felt too up in the air on them. (I’m 6’1″) They were amazing and I wouldn’t turn them down, but the Bronson just felt right to me.

  • James Workman says:

    and short riders cheered! as tall people got the shaft once again!

    being tall in a world designed for the numerical averages, so as to reach / tap a broader market, ALWAYS! leaves the tall people CRAMPED!

    Long live the 29ers!

    BMX barrowed from the road racers in the late 1970′s and early 1980′s.. same as the MTB crowd.. and the 700c will NEVER! die.. because it is not a FAD! Not that 650b / 27 is a FAD.. because the short people of the World can reach the pedals easier.. and the middle of the road / normal or better yet the numerical average height crowd will feel better moving to a bike that is smaller.. thusly more maneuverable. because none of the men that are 5’5″ to 5″10″ want to ride a Small Frame 29er.. because of the word SMALL! being stuck I their SMALL(ish) Napoleon Complexes, LULZ!

    the 650b boils down to the majority of men riding are less than average height, look around on the hill and at the Pros.. what do you see, don’t hate me for speaking the truth!

    and these men who are spending money.. ALREADY!! have Small issues.. and thus a Bike with SMALL written on it or more accurately when a woman notices how short in length their top tube is.. some women go around measuring top tubes.. would then laugh openly at the demure size of the little(ish) man with the little(ish) top tube.

    why does everyone try to be so Polite to these angry little Napoleon Types?

    mean while the tall people.. who are always reaching stuff and being helpful in general.. are stuck being made the bad guys because we had finally an area where we could come together and be clumsy together.. with not a lot of people watching because we would be in the woods where they couldn’t see us being clumsy!

    Tall People are being forced out of MTBing! by the little people! they steal everything!

    if you didn’t find this entertaining and or funny.. You Suck! not me.

  • Wacko says:

    Please.. 29ers aren’t going away and stop thinking all short people are bitter and vindictive. I could care less if my bike had a XXXXS stamp on it as long as it fit correctly to how I want to ride.

  • BigAussie says:

    I own a Giant Anthem 26″ custom build and a Giant talon 0 29er
    The anthem is my number 1 choice every time its just more fun
    I can see the point of a 27.5″ anthem it should be good but I will not be in a rush to get rid of the 26″
    back to the talon its spot on for moor rides but it feels a bit dull at the trails
    also giants own brand wheels on the cheaper models are not good my 29er wheels lasted 1 winter then I changed them for some mavic crossrides made it a better ride

  • sam says:

    I was holding out on the 29 er fad as long as I can and I believe it is for taller riders (5’10″) above guys. I am 5’8 and happy with my 26 until i rode a 9er after much hesitation. For starter going over roots and logs got much confident just cause it dint want to trip as easily as my 6er did and this was a hard tail as compared to my 6er full suspension and still the tire size soaked up the bumps and was easier to pedal climbs ! I am still going to hold out for the 27.5 , cause I think vertically challenged rider like myself will have trouble throwing around a 9er like i do with my 6er. But the 27.5 may be a happy medium for guys like me !

  • Mick says:

    I just moved from a Nomad to a Bronson and the 27.5″ are better. Most times I don’t notice them but when doing slow techie rocks they’re way better. Easier to hold a line through sketchy stuff too whether fast or slow, carves berms better, even seems to do skinny north shores better too although I’ve no idea why, and compared to the Nomad, it hops through the All Mountain Trials sections of the track I ride like a trials bike, but that’s probably down to the bike, who knows, and I reckon I ride faster, but it’s sometimes hard to work out if that’s because the bike is so refined or it’s the wheels, but probably a combination of both. End of the day 27.5′s are evolution in progress but that’s not to say that a good bike, regardless of wheel size, will always be a blast to ride, but IMO 27.5′s are more fun to ride than 26′er’s. The only thing I don’t like is that I’ve clipped my balls a few times on the back tyre when hanging off the back of the bike (ouch) but seem to have unconsciously adjusted my riding style as it’s not happened for awhile. I’m thinking that 29′er riders must have problems with the family jewels.
    A 27.5″ Nomad would be a game changer I reckon.

  • Tomek says:

    Holy s$&t! I was looking for some help in deciding if I should “upgrade” my 14yr hard tail stump jumper … I love that F-er and I feel like I can attack any trail without hesitation. Maybe it’s the engine? But seriously – if I’m having fun attacking the hills on my old 26er … Why the F should I be considering spending a lot of money on a new bike? Somebody shed some knowledge – I am cheap but I invest wisely for long term use! 27.5 or stick to my O.G. ride?

  • Mickey says:

    GIANT is the biggest bicycle producer in the world !

    But in the factories they actually produce aswell for other brands:

    i.e. Scott, Trek, Colnago, Bonetrager, ….whatever.

    Do not think that a bicycle brand is producing his own frames or parts…….

  • Shawn McAfee says:

    I like that Giant is pushing the envelope and trying something different. It shows a lot of confidence from the brand to step out and try something new.

    That said, I’m not 100% positive I agree with the 27.5 as a platform. It makes sense in some applications and regions, but others maybe not. I guess only more testing on the trails will prove to be right or wrong.

  • Si Walker says:

    Hi All,
    I have had 26ers for years and last year got a 29e, they are just too big in tight rutted ground like the peaks etc and at 5’9 i think the bike is just too big even on a medium frame. I am just about to buy a 650B and going for the Giant, it just has it for me cant wait to hit the trails and getting out for a long weekend in Wales 

  • DV says:

    I just got a 27.5 Giant Talon 4 in a the small frame size since I’m 5′ 7″. It’s acceleration is incredible, boy does it grab and grip and go, although I’ve never ridden a 26 so take my opinion there with a grain of salt. I tested a handful of 29ers, specifically Cannondale, GT, and Marin and just found them to not be as nimble as I like. I feel like I can do laps around a 29er, not really, but you get the idea. Ride with the GIANTS!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




VISIT US AT and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.