<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rase Rapid Adjust Seatpost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/rase-rapid-adjust-seatpost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/rase-rapid-adjust-seatpost/</link>
	<description>The Definitive Interbike Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robbo</title>
		<link>http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/rase-rapid-adjust-seatpost/#comment-14446</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/?p=1486#comment-14446</guid>
		<description>1.3lb?!? Sorry, lost me right there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.3lb?!? Sorry, lost me right there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TallyTwhacker</title>
		<link>http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/rase-rapid-adjust-seatpost/#comment-7803</link>
		<dc:creator>TallyTwhacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/?p=1486#comment-7803</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea but these posts are useless for I-Beam type seats (SEE SGD) which are lighter and a big innovation departure from the old fashioned twin rail assembly. By making an adjustable (on the fly) system with the I-Beam technology, one could write their own ticket for pricing (lord knows SDG does). Making the addition not only beneficial, but also lighter and more in alignment with modern technology (utilizing the twin rail system as about as archaic as using beach cruisers for mountain biking).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea but these posts are useless for I-Beam type seats (SEE SGD) which are lighter and a big innovation departure from the old fashioned twin rail assembly. By making an adjustable (on the fly) system with the I-Beam technology, one could write their own ticket for pricing (lord knows SDG does). Making the addition not only beneficial, but also lighter and more in alignment with modern technology (utilizing the twin rail system as about as archaic as using beach cruisers for mountain biking).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brodiegrrl</title>
		<link>http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/rase-rapid-adjust-seatpost/#comment-7784</link>
		<dc:creator>Brodiegrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/?p=1486#comment-7784</guid>
		<description>The wiggle in the Joplin is annoying. Hopefully this one won't have nearly as much...

What about the KS seatpost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wiggle in the Joplin is annoying. Hopefully this one won&#8217;t have nearly as much&#8230;</p>
<p>What about the KS seatpost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterat</title>
		<link>http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/rase-rapid-adjust-seatpost/#comment-7770</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.mtbr.com/interbike/?p=1486#comment-7770</guid>
		<description>That channel in the front of the seatpost looks like a crud catcher for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That channel in the front of the seatpost looks like a crud catcher for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
