Review: Princeton Tec Push

Great construction and quality but it's not rechargeable.

Lights Lights Shootout

2015 Lights Shootout

Princeton Tec Push Front

Princeton Tec is an outdoor sports company with a loyal following. The Princeton Tec Push is a well-built, basic light for commuting, but it hasn’t changed much in two years and that is a bad omen for an LED light.

Its biggest flaw is that it’s not rechargeable. Bearable a couple years ago, it’s simply not competitive with a crop of $50 lights that have developed equal or better brightness.

For $50, Princeton Tec offers a light that claims 150 Lumens, but actually measured higher at 199 Lumens. It also sports great side lighting with a nice red strip of light on each side.

Beam Pattern Photo

We photographed the lights in the same location setting with the same camera settings. The photos were taken in the back yard that is approximately 25 yards long. These photos feature many objects and a distinct background to analyze detail and beam pattern. Compare all Beam Patterns here »

Princeton Tec Push Backyard Beam Pattern

Integrating Sphere Measured Lumens

This light measured 199 Lumens in an integrating sphere. Claimed Lumens by the manufacturer is 165 Lumens. The Lumen-hour graph below shows how the light performs over the first three minutes of its battery cycle. Compare all Lumen Tests here »

Princeton Tech Push 165 Lumen Chart

Strengths
  • Exceeds Lumen claims
  • Good commuter option
  • Great mount
Weaknesses
  • Needs to be rechargeable in this day and age
  • The competition has caught up with brighter lights that are rechargeable
Specifications
  • Price: $50
  • Claimed Lumens: 165 Lumens
  • Measured Lumens: 199 Lumens
  • Lumens per $: 3.98 Lumens
  • Lumens per gram: 1.73 Lumens
  • Time on High: 4:00 Hours
  • Charge Time: n/a Hours
  • Mounted Weight: 115 grams
  • Category: Commuter
Overall Rating

3 Flamin' Chili Peppers 3 out of 5 Flamin’ Chili Peppers

For more information visit www.princetontec.com.

This article is part of Mtbr and RoadBikeReview’s 2015 Lights Shootout. To see all the bike lights tested CLICK HERE.

Photo Thumbnails (click to enlarge)

About the author: Francis Cebedo

The founder of mtbr and roadbikereview, Francis Cebedo believes that every cyclist has a lot to teach and a lot to learn. "Our websites are communal hubs for sharing cycling experiences, trading adventure stories, and passing along product information and opinions." Francis' favorite bike is the last bike he rode, whether it's a dirt jumper, singlespeed, trail bike, lugged commuter or ultralight carbon road steed. Indeed, Francis loves cycling in all its forms and is happiest when infecting others with that same passion. Francis also believes that IPA will save America.


Related Articles


NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Andy says:

    I actually recently bought a Push specifically because it wasn’t rechargeable. I was participating in a multiday self supported ride and wanted a light that put out enough light to ride after dark if I had to, but wouldn’t be rendered useless away from a power source should the batteries die. It worked well and I’m happy with the light.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*


THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.