Santa Cruz Bronson Review

A responsive descender

27.5 All Mountain Trail

Video: Santa Cruz Syndicate Playing with the Santa Cruz Bronson

Video: Bike Magazine goes in depth with Joe Graney of Santa Cruz Engineering.

The Bike Magazine Story on the Santa Cruz Bronson is here.

Video: A fascinating look at Santa Cruz product development

April 1 brings another great product introduction for Santa Cruz Bicycles this year.

About the author: Francis Cebedo

The founder of mtbr and roadbikereview, Francis Cebedo believes that every cyclist has a lot to teach and a lot to learn. "Our websites are communal hubs for sharing cycling experiences, trading adventure stories, and passing along product information and opinions." Francis' favorite bike is the last bike he rode, whether it's a dirt jumper, singlespeed, trail bike, lugged commuter or ultralight carbon road steed. Indeed, Francis loves cycling in all its forms and is happiest when infecting others with that same passion. Francis also believes that IPA will save America.

Related Articles

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:

Wordpress Comments:

  • old school says:

    Wasn’t SC saying just recently that they saw no value in the 650b wheel size?

  • Francis Cebedo says:

    >>Wasnโ€™t SC saying just recently that they saw no value in the 650b wheel size?

    In basketball, that’s called a head fake. They poke fun at the social media hype often.

  • Kirk Bailey says:

    Although the Santa Cruz is a very popular company and now having a 650b bike, I find there are a couple of other options out there with better pricing. i.e. Scott’s Genius 700 series. It may only have 140 mm of travel, however it handles very nicely compared to most of the other 650b I have tried. Scott’s also gone to a 3 position remote lock out for the fork and rear shock. The Scott 740 weight is well under 30lbs. And if you upgraded to different wheels set, it could be under 25lbs. We don’t see many guys buying into the carbon framed models, so most (around my part of CA) will be eyeing the alu framed version. Non-the-less, Very nice bike Santa Cruz!!!

    • liquidSpin says:

      I totally agree. The new 2013 Scott Genius is just incredible…just wish I had the loot to buy one. However, I’m happy with my 2012 Scott Genius ๐Ÿ™‚

  • Brooks Yancey says:

    Looks like a beautiful machine, but why is it that a category only gets legitimized when SC enters the market? Kind of an insult to the other manufacturers that put in the work on the leading edge concepts and design. In any other industry that would be product suicide, but in the MB world we seem to put a disproportionately high value on the “cool” factor.

    • Mark Baeder says:

      I’m not saying others aren’t doing 650b right, but anyone can jam 650 wheels onto a 26″ bike. Designing it from the ground up can make a difference. Just as SC did with the Tallboy- they were later to the market, but instantly one of the better sellers because a lot of FS 29ers at the time rode like crap. I’m sure the cool factor/internet hype machine helps too though ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Izzy says:

    New on the top of my lust list!

  • MJ says:

    Nice to see Santa Cruz jump in. 650b will make us taller, smarter, happier, just generally more desirable. Well…. not really. Riding my Jamis 650b for 1.5 years now and still loving it. Santa Cruz makes great bikes. Their entry into 650b may help other riders stop thinking we’re the lunatic fringe on our tweener wheelsize. Thanks for the new choices!

  • GJ, CO says:

    Glad SC is making a 650b! Hopefully they’ll make it available on the Blur TR platform soon. A conversion for the linkage or dropout would work. And please SC, move the rear derailleur cable boss from the rear of the seattube on the Blur TRc.

    Also, how about a 20mm axle 650b fork? Anyone??

  • Mr. K says:

    Yes, I have a problem with SC saying they had no interest in 650b last year. So, I bought a Blur LT and put 650b wheels on it. Does anybody have an opinion on bb height? My Blur with 650b wheels is just a touch over 14″. Since I ride East Coast trails, I like the fact of having a bb height, but wish it were a little lower. Also, anybody if the Bronson’s rear triangle swingarm would fit on my 2012 Blur LT? It would be nice to have a 142×12 axle instead of QR. Thanx, Mr. K

  • WB says:

    White Bros Fluid 650B 20mm axle. Been riding one for a year and a half.

  • Mickey DeSadist says:

    Wheel size is the only substantial innovation in years. Should be interesting.

  • Michael says:

    Sure would like to see SC come out with a 4.7 lb – 5″ travel 27.5…

  • Adam says:

    I’m so confused… I think I will just keep riding my Blur Lt and my 907.
    Looks fun though

  • Peter says:

    This bike looks awesome. I demo’ed the Norco Range Killer B2 for a few days last week while vacationing in Moab, did the Mag7 and a few other of the famous trails on it. I currently ride a Specialized Pitch. The Norco felt really fast, even with 160mm of fork – I don’t know if it was the frame and/or the wheel size, but it just felt good. I had heard from a few SC local shops here in the Bay Area that SC had told them they were preparing for the switch to 650b, but I had heard they were redesigning the Nomad for the wheel size. But whatever – I was holding off on a new ride until the 650b thing got settled, I’ll definitely be looking at this.

  • Julius says:

    I WAS looking at the Superlight 29 but now I have to hesitate!

  • roger says:

    The SC blur LT plaform beats any of the current offerings in the 650b market before the Bronson. bhaw ha ha

  • Izzy says:

    Haha, “aspirational” ๐Ÿ˜‰
    Thanks for comparing with the Sight (my former dream bike, before the Bronson came)
    This now begs the question, what will happen to the Nomad?

  • Mike says:

    Santa Cruz builds great bikes and I am really interested in picking one of these up. I am thinking of a custom build to get the weight down. I figure getting rid of the poppy post and big rubber will help. Interesting they don’t spec with an enve dh bar.

  • Jamie says:

    Your thoughts on bottom bracket are not entirely correct. You are using static unsagged numbers to imply how the bike will carve singletrack. If they had the same travel, then it is apples to apples comparison.

    Assuming vertical travel (which is not correct, but a good approximation)

    sagged bottom bracket at 30%
    Blur TRc =13.1 unsagged bb height -30% sag*125mm/25.4=11.62 inches
    Bronson =13.6 unsagged bb height-30% sag*150mm/25.4=11.8 inches

    So the reality is 0.2 inches, not 0.5 inches, so the differences are less than originally suggested.

  • Michael says:

    I still ride my superlite(12 years now), its like flying coach maybe-I never want to fly business or first-I dont know what I am missing- those seats sure look inviting though. I have to save the money to keep the 3 kids outfitted in their outdoor endeavors. Lots of nice new bikes.

  • Dale Burton says:

    I test rode the Bronson yesterday on an 8-km loop of varying terrain that finished off with a great down hill section that had everything man made ramped jumps.

    Having now ridden both the Tall Boy and Bronson carbon versions (circa $6,500) bikes I can say these bikes were not fun, at least for me anyway. I rode the Intense Carbine 27.5 right after the Bronson and the difference in easy of riding was like night and day.

    The Intense was the better bike for me, although the rear tire clearance was really tight to the point I got tire buzz when pushing it hard on the down hill sections. They should have changed the chain & seat stays to accommodate 27.5 instead just replacing the dropouts.

    Before unloading a ton of cash on a decent 27.5 you really need to ride them hard off road. Just going on the street outside the LBS you may find you bought something less than you bargained forโ€ฆ!

  • Leonidas says:

    Norco Sight actually has 73.9 estimated seat tube angle and this is comparable to the 73 of the bronson. The 70 mentioned is the actual and not what it counts to teh rider. Was this mistake made purposly? Only the cable routing is an advantage – again according to an author who made a serious mistake. The Sight is lower, shorter stays, better SA and the bronson better cable routing, which is better now?

  • Matias says:

    Hi i am from chile,south america
    I m looking for a santa cruz bronson i am 5’10” tall and i want to go for the medium size
    Is that ok ?
    I also tried a rune v2 in medium size and i felt a little bit more confortable
    Which bike should i get?
    I personally prefer the bronson
    Saludos desde chile

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.