WTB Convict 2.5 tire first impressions

Checking out WTB's grippiest tire

Side profile reveals the support on the side knobs.

Side profile reveals the support on the side knobs.

Summer is here and one of the biggest dangers to a rider’s safety now is the front tire washing out, sending the rider onto the ground. What are usually reliable, high grip corners and berms are now a mixture of holes, loose rocks and dust. That’s why we were excited to hear about WTB’s new offering, the Convict 2.5. It’s not just a downhill tire but a ‘gravity’ tire. And who doesn’t deal with gravity on every ride?

Like many, our crew likes to climb calmly but descend with conviction that our aging bodies will allow. We now wear light knee pads on every ride because we never plan on crashing, but know they are inevitable. So we consider beefy tires like the WTB Convicts akin to knee pads on your wheels. They’ll offer that extra level of protection by avoiding crashes when we run out of talent.

Average weights for the different Convict varieties.

Average weights for the different Convict varieties.

The Convict is WTB’s beefiest tire in a line already occupied by the capable Vigilante, Trail Boss and Breakout tires. Thus, the Convict will only be available in 2.5 size. But it will be available in three casings:

  • TCS Light, (high grip)
  • TCS Tough, (high grip)
  • TCS Tough, (fast rolling)

Mind you, ‘light’ in TCS Light is a misnomer since it is quite a beefy casing, specially compared to the competition. And the weight is no ballerina either with all these versions topping 1000 grams. The TCS Tough is indeed a very beefy casing developed in the shale-infested descents of Downieville, CA.

The Salsa Redpoint was our first test bed for the WTB Convict gravity tire.

The Salsa Redpoint was our first test bed for the WTB Convict gravity tire.

How did it ride?

Our first test with the WTB Convict was a very interesting testimonial indeed. Testing the Salsa Redpoint with 150mm of travel in Northstar Bike Park, we had a great time with the bike. But the blown out trails at the bottom of the mountain nearly caused our front end to wash out three times. And near the top, at the built-up trails called Livewire and Gypsy, dust over rock and dust over wood caused the stock Hans Dampf Schwalbe tires to slide around a bit.

So we put on WTB Convicts and did the same trails. The experience was dramatically different as the bike was a lot more secure and we were able to get more aggressive with the bike. Cornering was sure-footed and there was none of that slip-sliding around we experienced earlier.

Weight is 1060 for the High Grip version with Light Casing.

Weight is 1060 for the High Grip version with Light Casing.

Braking too was quite a bit better as we were able to brake later on high speed corners. On some very steep, albeit short pitches, we were able to control the speed much better with the rear tire avoiding the untimely lock-up.

On swoopy trails, we were able to corner faster and maintain for speed so these were definitely the right tires for these conditions.

On a few short climbs, one could feel the tires were a bit slower. We’ll explore this more on our home trails. The good news is WTB has enough tires in its arsenal to select the perfect rear tire that will match up with a Convict front tire. Marketing guy Clayton Wangbichler recommends the WTB Breakout tire in TCS Tough and Fast Rolling. TCS tough since the rear tire takes a lot of the rider’s weight and susceptible to pinch flats and abuse. Fast Rolling compound optimizes for speed for those long, grueling rides.

Convict 2.5 with High Grip and Light casing is up front with WTB Breakout 2.3 Fast Rolling and Tough casing is on the rear to optimize for big descents and long climbs.

Convict 2.5 with High Grip and Light casing is up front with WTB Breakout 2.3 Fast Rolling and Tough casing is on the rear to optimize for big descents and long climbs.

We are now ready to test with the optimized Ibis HD3 above. Since the bike will be used for 5000+ foot climbs as well as descents, we chose to optimize the tire setup. The great thing about having a very grippy tire option is one can match it with a rear tire to balance out the weight and rolling resistance needs.

On this setup, rear gets the faster rolling WTB Breakout. It gets the WTB Tough casing since that’s where the rider’s weight is and where more sidewall damage occurs. Faster rubber to optimize for rolling resistance.

For more info please visit wtb.com.

About the author: Francis Cebedo

The founder of mtbr and roadbikereview, Francis Cebedo believes that every cyclist has a lot to teach and a lot to learn. "Our websites are communal hubs for sharing cycling experiences, trading adventure stories, and passing along product information and opinions." Francis' favorite bike is the last bike he rode, whether it's a dirt jumper, singlespeed, trail bike, lugged commuter or ultralight carbon road steed. Indeed, Francis loves cycling in all its forms and is happiest when infecting others with that same passion. Francis also believes that IPA will save America.

Related Articles


  • JCWages says:

    My experience with this tire has been completely positive. The only thing I can conjure up as a negative is the the weight. I’ll gladly trade increased weight for a solid tire that offers gobs of traction at all lean angles.

  • Mike says:

    No 26 inch offering, as usual

    • Ryan says:

      Molds are expensive. 26″ isn’t a money maker because the demand isn’t that high these days. I work for a carbon wheel manufacturer. I’d love to do a wide 26″ carbon wheel because then I’d have a set for one of my favorite bikes, but there’s just not enough demand to justify the cost of designing and machining the mold. It’s hard to find a laptop computer with a 3 1/2″ floppy drive anymore, too. Time marches on.

  • UseYourBody says:

    @Ryan, marketing marches on… yet the absurdity of many corps abandoning 26″ is that for many riders, trails, and body sizes 26″ is BETTER…
    Larger wheels are objectively faster, however nearly everyone agrees larger wheels are less nimble and less maneuverable. What wheels sizes do the Semenuks, MacCaskills, and Söderströms of the world ride, doing the most insane tricks and having the most fun? The majority of riders are interested in that simple sense of adventure and the *sensation* of speed, not objective speed timed by the clock at an EWS event. Smaller, more nimble wheels FEEL faster, even tho the clock prove them a margin slower. Who cares if you were 1 second faster?! Which brings up the tragedy of Strava, contributing to a minority of riders who can’t seem to remember they were perfectly happy feeling the thrill of riding bikes on crazy trails without anyone telling them how many milliseconds slower or faster they may have been on any particular ride. (Not to mention trail confict/access issues it creates by turning every trail into a drag strip.)
    Huge props and thanks to WTB, Salsa, Surly and others who are smart enough and true enough to the simple, badass roots of mtb to produce new 26″ tires, rims, and bikes.

  • Migu says:

    No demand for 26″? Thats a joke? There are still 70% of all MTBs on 26 out there. They are not new and need new tires…. I don’t think 29/650B need new tire because they are new. My 26 x 2,5 Muddy Mary is same dia as 650B… 650B is a Marketing-Joke!

  • Utah John says:

    yeah, but most of those guys won’t spend more than $20 for a new rim, they are busy buying and recycling old stuff as much as possible. So expensive and progressive 26″ stuff just isn’t going to happen, the market isn’t there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.